Efforts to eradicate corruption have been carried out for a long time by using various methods, sanctions against perpetrators of corruption. In examining and deciding criminal cases before him, judges have the freedom to make legal discoveries and make judgments. All decisions of a judge are left to the views and beliefs of the judge to determine whether or not the defendant is guilty. In this study, the author uses a normative juridical approach. Research Specifications, this research is descriptive analytical. Types of data, namely secondary data. Data was collected through library research on secondary data. The data obtained in this study were analyzed using qualitative normative methods. The results of this study are: First, that the judge's considerations in imposing sentencing decisions related to Corruption Crimes must pay attention to juridical and non-juridical considerations. Justice is viewed from the perspective of justice for the accused. Second, the impact of the minimum punishment specifically for corruptors affects the life of the accused in society, such as feeling ashamed, losing honor, being ostracized, distrusted and even looked down upon by the community, neighbors and friends, the impact is self-defeating and automatically affects the defendant's nuclear family.