Article 14 paragraph (1) of Aceh’s Qanun Number 9 of 2008 specifies that the customary settlements referenced in Article 13 paragraph (2) include customary settlements in Gampong or other names, Mukim, and Laot. According to the Qanun, no provisions govern customary dispute resolution through the Keujruen Blang Chik customary institution. However, in the Pidie Jaya Regency community, the Keujruen Blang customary institution still plays an active role in society. This is normative legal research. This study attempts to describe the history of rice field disputes in the Pidie Jaya community, Keujruen Chik's role in resolving rice field disputes in Pidie Jaya, and the optimal arrangement for Keujruen Chik's involvement in resolving rice field disputes in Pidie Jaya. According to the study's findings, the causes of disputes in the rice fields of the Pidie Jaya community were the same as the causes of disputes in the Musa Settlements of Bandar Baru Subdistrict and the Kuta Reuntang Settlements of Meurah Dua District, disagreements, uncontrollable emotions, a lack of communication between farmers, and a lack of farmer education and Religion. The role of Keujruen Chik in resolving rice field conflicts in Pidie Jaya, as defined by Acehnese customary law, has given the Keujruen Chik customary institution a significant role. This is the authority granted to the Keujruen Chik traditional institution to penalize those penalize who refuse to work together and settle conflicts between farmers. The optimum arrangement for Keujruen Chik's participation in resolving rice field conflicts in Pidie Jaya is for Keujruen Blang's status to be acknowledged by Aceh Governor Regulation number 45 of 2015 concerning the Role of Keujruen Blang in Irrigation Management. t is also a customary judicial institution that still exists today in the world of agriculture, particularly in the field of rice fields. However, in these regulations, there is no specific regulation regarding the position of the Keujruen Blang as a customary institution, and the tasks and authority in resolving the disputes are limited.