ARCHIVES
VOL. 5, ISSUE 3 (2023)
Judges’ juridical analysis in trying women that are dealing with the law
Authors
Indah Pertiwi, Rizanizarli , Muhammad Ya’kub Ayub Kadir
Abstract
There is the Supreme Court Ordinance (PERMA)
Number 3, 2017 on Trial Guidelines for Women Facing Charges. Women in conflict
with the law are defined as women who are victims, perpetrators, and witnesses.
The Supreme Court adopts a policy to eradicate gender-based discrimination in
the judicial system because women are frequently subjected to it. The purpose
of this study is to explain the norms that should be the guidelines for judges
in the trial of women facing the law in order to achieve justice and to assess
the role of the judge in the implementation of PERMA Number 3, 2017 in the
environment of the Supreme Court's judicial institutions. The method employed
is juris-normative because a legal void necessitates a comprehensive review of
legal norms. The results of the study revealed the guidelines of the judge in
the trial of women who are confronted with the law or in conflict with the
subject in several chapters, including article 7 of the PERMA Number 3, 2017
judge can denounce a person if in the process of trial examination committed
discrimination against women confronted as victims, perpetrators, and
witnesses, and the role of judges in the implementation of PERMA Number 3, 2017
influenced the judges' considerations in hi. It is recommended that this
guideline be broadly dissocialized to serve as a reference for judges in their
treatment of women facing the law.
Download
Pages:77-79
How to cite this article:
Indah Pertiwi, Rizanizarli , Muhammad Ya’kub Ayub Kadir "Judges’ juridical analysis in trying women that are dealing with the law". International Journal of Law, Policy and Social Review, Vol 5, Issue 3, 2023, Pages 77-79
Download Author Certificate
Please enter the email address corresponding to this article submission to download your certificate.