Logo
International Journal of
Law, Policy and Social Review
ARCHIVES
VOL. 6, ISSUE 3 (2024)
Analysis and comparison of construction law in Iran and China
Authors
Fortunata Giada Modaffari
Abstract

This article has the task of analyzing and focusing on the differences and possible similarities that the construction sector has in common, therefore Construction Law, in two of the greatest world powers in terms of innovation and still little known globally for their construction and the consequent law that creates limitations and organizations. In addition, the purpose of the article is also to direct attention to the methods of resolving disputes in these specific areas, through the use of arbitration and specifically related the two different geopolitical area.

For China was analysed the Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China that in the Article 1 is committed to ensure the impartial and prompt arbitration of economic disputes, protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the parties, and guaranteeing the sound development of the socialist market economy.

At the same time, an analysis of arbitration as understood in Iran has been carried out since its introduction in 1939, retracing what is specified in Articles 454 to 501 of the Iranian Code of Civil Procedure (the 2007 version is currently in force) up to the most recent regulations/additions which have considered arbitration as one of the most important dispute settlement method.
Download
Pages:337-339
How to cite this article:
Fortunata Giada Modaffari "Analysis and comparison of construction law in Iran and China". International Journal of Law, Policy and Social Review, Vol 6, Issue 3, 2024, Pages 337-339
Download Author Certificate

Please enter the email address corresponding to this article submission to download your certificate.