ARCHIVES
VOL. 6, ISSUE 3 (2024)
Repressive legal protection of banks as creditors of mortgage holders seized by the state related to corruption cases
Authors
Adi Nurdianto, Ari Purwadi, Fries Melia Salviana
Abstract
This research aims to analyse the dualism that takes precedence in
terms of banks as holders of mortgage rights with assets seized by the state
related to corruption. This research is normative legal research with a
statutory, conceptual, and case approach. Seizure The formulation of the
problem in: a) Legal Position of Banks as Creditors of Mortgage Holders Seized
by the State Related to Corruption Cases; and b) Ratio Decedendi of Judge
Decisions Regarding Banks as Creditors of Mortgage Holders Seized by the State
Related to Corruption Cases. The result of this research is that the legal
position of the bank as a preferred creditor of the holder of a mortgage right
that is seized by the state related to a corruption case, the bank should still
get legal protection, because the bank as a preferred creditor has a privilege
over the sale of the object of the mortgage right to pay off the debtor's legal
obligations must be protected by law, so that the Bank can submit legal
remedies in accordance with Perma 2/2022.
Download
Pages:268-271
How to cite this article:
Adi Nurdianto, Ari Purwadi, Fries Melia Salviana "Repressive legal protection of banks as creditors of mortgage holders seized by the state related to corruption cases". International Journal of Law, Policy and Social Review, Vol 6, Issue 3, 2024, Pages 268-271
Download Author Certificate
Please enter the email address corresponding to this article submission to download your certificate.