Based on Article 66 paragraph (1) of Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary, it clearly states that only the Notary Honorary Council can approve the summons and/or collection of the Minutes of the Deed and/or letters attached to the minutes of the deed or the Notary protocol in the Notary's storage. However, in reality, some cases are permitted, and those that are not allowed by the Aceh Region Notary Honorary Council to be examined by investigators.

Based on the background above, this study aims to analyze the problem of the position of the Notary Honorary Council regarding the summons of notaries by investigators, the considerations of the Notary Honorary Council in granting permission for investigators to examine notaries suspected of committing criminal acts and the legal efforts that notaries can take against the decision of the Notary Honorary Council regarding the approval of investigators' requests.

The research method used in this study is empirical juridical, which is a type of sociological, legal research or field research that examines applicable legal provisions and what happens in reality in society. Data collection is carried out by interviewing related parties to answer the problems in this study.

The study results show that the Notary Honorary Council acts as a body with the authority to carry out Notary guidance and the obligation to provide approval or rejection for investigation and the judicial process. The approval given by the Notary Honorary Council to investigators is based on considerations of alleged criminal acts or assisting law enforcement in collecting evidence to detain suspects of criminal acts. The legal efforts that a notary can take if they do not accept the Notary Honorary Council decides to file a civil lawsuit for compensation to the District Court.