Logo
International Journal of
Law, Policy and Social Review
ARCHIVES
VOL. 7, ISSUE 4 (2025)
Comparative analysis of judicial review in India, USA and UK
Authors
Nidhi, Dr. Dev Parbhakar
Abstract
Judicial review is the constitutional mechanism through which courts ensure that the actions of the legislature and executive remain within the limits of law. It acts as a safeguard for fundamental rights, the rule of law, and the separation of powers. This paper provides a detailed comparative analysis of judicial review in India, the United States, and the United Kingdom, exploring their origins, evolution, scope, and constitutional foundations. The American model represents a strong-form, decentralized system where constitutional supremacy empowers all courts to strike down unconstitutional acts. The British model, rooted in parliamentary sovereignty and common law principles, emphasizes legality, fairness, and proportionality, later enhanced by the Human Rights Act, 1998. India’s framework, with its written Constitution and expansive remedial powers under Articles 13, 32, and 226, integrates both rights protection and structural review, even extending to constitutional amendments under the Basic Structure Doctrine. The study highlights how each system balances judicial authority with democratic accountability and identifies shared techniques such as proportionality, deference, and structured reasoning. It also examines emerging challenges like judicial overreach, compliance issues, and the impact of digital governance under statutes like the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. Ultimately, the paper concludes that a principled, transparent, and proportionate judicial review is essential for maintaining constitutional order while allowing democratic institutions to evolve responsibly in response to societal and technological change.
Download
Pages:91-96
How to cite this article:
Nidhi, Dr. Dev Parbhakar "Comparative analysis of judicial review in India, USA and UK". International Journal of Law, Policy and Social Review, Vol 7, Issue 4, 2025, Pages 91-96
Download Author Certificate

Please enter the email address corresponding to this article submission to download your certificate.