The execution of court judgments constitutes the final and decisive stage in civil litigation, aimed at ensuring legal certainty and the effective realization of justice for the parties involved. However, in practice, the enforcement of civil judgments in Indonesia frequently encounters a wide array of obstacles, both juridical and non-juridical in nature. This study seeks to critically examine the underlying problems associated with the execution of judgments within the Indonesian civil law system and to propose normative solutions to address such challenges. 

This research employs a normative juridical method, utilizing both statutory and conceptual approaches to analyze the existing legal framework and its practical implications. The findings reveal that the principal impediments to effective execution include resistance from judgment debtors, competing claims from third parties, ambiguity concerning the object of dispute, and the limited effectiveness of law enforcement authorities. Accordingly, this study underscores the urgent need for regulatory reform and the strengthening of execution mechanisms in order to enhance legal certainty, uphold the authority of judicial decisions, and ensure the realization of substantive justice.